August 2011 - The European Commission continues to scrutinise the Swedish wolf hunt. In mid-June its services expressed a series of concerns in a reasoned opinion to the Swedish government where it asked Sweden to amend certain parts of its wolf policy. In particular it believes that the licensed hunting under derogations in the EU Habitats Directive is in breach of EU nature legislation.
The Swedish government allows for a limited strictly controlled hunt as a management measure aiming to create greater social acceptance for controversial conservation measures, such as the relocation and introduction of wolves into new areas to solve problems of inbreeding. This strategy to ensure the long-term maintenance of the wolf populations at a favourable conservation status was not invented by the Swedish government. It finds its support in international conservation science, including in EU-funded scientific projects, notably the Guidelines for population level management plans for large carnivores in Europe prepared for the Commission by the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe.
FACE has been working very closely with the Swedish Hunters Association to try and ensure some objectivity in the debate and has worked to provide comments and details to the EU Commission and also back to Sweden for use by the Hunters Association in their national work.
More recently the Swedish Government has invited the Commission to visit the country to get an objective view of the conservation measures taken and hopefully meet and see some of the realities of people living and working in areas affected by wolves, a move welcomed by the Swedish Hunters Association.
On 7 July, Commission officials met with representatives of the Swedish Hunters Association who gave an objective and evidence-based overview of hunting in Sweden, answering questions and providing information. This was followed by providing a first-hand insight into the situation by taking the Commission officials into the heartland of the Swedish wolf territory in the middle of the country, where they could see wolf tracks, the remains of a moose taken by wolves and an abandoned wolf den.
According to the Swedish hunting magazine Svensk Jakt, the Commission was surprised at how carefully and meticulously the Swedish authorities had organised and followed up the wolf hunt.
It remains to be seen whether this visit will allow the Commission officials in Brussels to step outside conventional views and accept that the wolf population cannot survive in a purely protectionist regime. If no agreement has been reached before mid-August, the Commission may refer Sweden to the EU Court of Justice. |